Back

HUGE California Traffic Tickets Fines Effective 01/06/10

 California needs money, so pay close attention to the rules of the road! I was able to pull this up and thought you might be interested.

 
 Please be extremely careful in your driving and car registration & insurance matters.  State of California is broke and they are trying hard to squeeze all of us hard to collect money.  Effective immediately, if you do not stop at the red light, be ready to pay $ 436 in fines or if you pass a school bus with flashing red signals, you will be charged $ 616.  The state of California is going for blood, so be extra careful in driving, you can not afford messing with them.  I have been hearing that highway patrols are under pressure to issue a lot more tickets than last year with at least 30% increase in fines over 2009, so beware of radar guns, highway and traffic cameras installed everywhere and the tougher enforcement of parking rules.  Just for your info, the next time you park in the handicapped zone, even for a minute, you will be looking at almost $ 1000 in parking tickets, so it’d better be worth it.
 
 
   

 Traffic Tickets Fines (Effective 01/06/2010)
Violation 
Total Fine Due
VC 12814.6 
$214 
Failure to obey license provisions. 
VC 14600(A) 
$214 
Failure to notify DMV of address change within 10 days
Note: The fine may be reduced with valid proof of correction.
VC 16028(A)
$796
Failure to provide evidence of financial responsibility (insurance)
Note: This fine may be reduced with proof of insurance on or after the violation date.
VC 21453(A)
$436
Failure to stop at a red signal.
VC 22350
$214
VC 22349
Unsafe Speed, 1 to 15 miles over the limit.
VC 22350
$328
VC 22349
Unsafe Speed, 16 to 25 miles over the limit.
VC 22450
$214
Failure to stop at a stop sign.
VC 22454(A)
$616
Passing a school bus with flashing red signals.
VC 23123(A)
$148
Drive using wireless phone not hands free, First offense
VC 23123(A)
$256
Drive using wireless phone not hands free, For each subsequent offense.
VC 23123.5(A)
$148
Drive while wireless device to send, read or write text.
VC 23124(B)
$148
Minor drive using wireless phone.
VC 22500(I)
$976
Parking in a bus loading area.
VC 22507.8(A through C)
$976
Violation of disabled parking provisions, first offense.
VC 22507.8(A through C)
$1876
Violation of disabled parking provisions, second offense.
VC 26708(A)
$178
Unlawful material on vehicle windows.
VC 27150(A and B)
$178
Adequate muffler required
VC 27315(D and E)
$148
Mandatory use of seat belts.
VC 27360(A and B)
$436
Mandatory use of child passenger restraints
Note: This fine may be reduced by completing a court authorized child seat diversion program.
VC 27400
$178
Headsets/Earplugs over both ears.
VC 27803 (A through C)
$178
Motorcycle safety helmet requirements.
VC 34506.3
$616
Commercial Driver – Log book violation
VC 4000(A)
$256
No evidence of current registration.
Note: The fine may be reduced with valid proof of correction.
VC 4159
$178
Notify DMV of change of address within 10 days.
Note: The fine may be reduced with valid proof of correction.
VC 5200
$178
Display of license plates.
Note: The fine may be reduced with valid proof of correction.
VC 9400 (A through C)
$178
Commercial weight fees due.
Note: The fine may be reduced with valid proof of correction.

 
author avatar
pottsnew

You may also like

Employers Must Reimburse Employees for Using Their Personal Cell Phones
25 August, 2014

Reimbursing employees for expenses has been the source of confusion for employers. One area, not generally considered, is reimbursing employees for the use of their personal cell phones for company business. Well, the bell has been rung. Last week a Read More »

The Definition of “Spouse” to Legally Married Same-Sex Couples
30 June, 2014

There appears to be some confusion when employers are attempting to accommodate FMLA leave requests for the “spouse” of a same-sex couple. Well, to clarify this issue, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) has announced a notice of proposed rulemaking to Read More »

EEOC Cracking Down on “Speaking English Only Policies”
23 June, 2014

Immigration reform continues to be a hot button issue, and a recent rash of lawsuits continues to fuel the debate over whether an “English-only” rule constitutes national origin discrimination. The EEOC’s position is that a “rule requiring employees to speak Read More »

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accessibility Tools
hide